Read Write Speak It!

How to Get Students to Revise: Create Version 1

 

Ready to grow his writing.
Ready to grow his writing!

Labels matter. The first thing we do is ask every writer to label every new piece of writing “Version 1.” This makes it clear from the beginning that this is an embryonic document. We use the word “draft” as a verb. There are no “first drafts” in our writing workshops because a first draft just sounds like a throw away. Instead, we take Version 1 and begin to tinker with it. Change a sentence? Add an adjective? Writers are on Version 2, and the process continues.

We begin very simply and then increase complexity with subsequent revisions. A writing lesson might go like this:
• Think of a simile comparison regarding XYZ. (This is Version 1.)
• Use that to develop a more complete description of your subject matter. (This is Version 2.)
• Can you add some sensory terms to bring the reader into the scene? (This is Version 3.)
• Bring a character into the situation. What would that character say? (This is Version 4.)

How did we come up with this approach? This is how we write. We are both trade book authors and writers of professional development books. Before that, we were both business writers—Michael was an engineer for 23 years and Sara was in public relations. We deconstructed our writing practice and realized a couple important things:

1. We never start at the beginning of a long piece of writing, develop a story arc according to some predetermined pattern, and then use a rubric to make it right.
2. All writing is creative. Any time we begin with a blank page and put words on it, it is a creative process.

When we visit schools, we show teachers how they can use simple frameworks to help students jump start their writing by starting with Version 1. We show them how we guide students through the next couple versions. Writers will discard the framework as the writing takes off on its own, kind of like taking off the jumper cables after the car is running.

Kids intuitively get it. We compare the writing process to playing a video game or learning a sport; people start with simple moves and level up. Students begin to internalize the reality that revision is incremental, and writing is always an evolving process. We’ve found that the teachers we work with are excited by this writing process, and even relieved. Start simple and add complexity is a recipe for success as students adopt an “I can do that,” attitude.

We actually have kids bragging,
“I’m on Version 6!”
“Oh, yeah? I’m on Version 13!”

About one of our favorite lines to hear from kids is, “Oh, don’t worry, just put it down. It’s only Version 1.” We reinforce that no one expects the first version to be perfect, it’s just something to build on. And then we offer choices on how to take that next step.

We also invite students to share aloud throughout the writing process. By reading aloud, Version 1 and Version 2, partnering, or working with a mini writers’ group, students are able to see and hear their own progress as writers. We’ll ask, “Which version is working better for you?” Then we’ll let the writer explain what made the revised version better and where they want to take it next.

By building revision into the beginning of the writing process rather than leaving it until end, students are eager to add complexity and clarity to their writing.

For more information about our writing process, you might want to check out From Striving to Thriving Writers, Strategies to Jumpstart Writing, Scholastic. (co-author Stephanie Harvey).  Reposted from Scholastic Teaching Tools blog. 

Share:

Facebook
Twitter
Pinterest
LinkedIn

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

On Key

Related Posts

SoyPout

Guest Blog from Malaysia

Rita Moltzan is a teaching librarian at the Raffles American School, Johor.   Read Write  Speak it Meets SWI! My 4th grade ELL class and

rollingwith ING

Rolling with ING Verbs

January 31, 2022 To support the students’ reading, we chose this poem from RWS Primary 1 which included a group of S digraphs. We read